Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens
Identifieur interne : 002D01 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 002D00; suivant : 002D02Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens
Auteurs : Ren-Hua Chung ; Elizabeth R. Hauser ; Eden R. MartinSource :
- Genetic Epidemiology [ 0741-0395 ] ; 2007-02.
English descriptors
Abstract
Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20196
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title><author><name sortKey="Chung, Ren Ua" sort="Chung, Ren Ua" uniqKey="Chung R" first="Ren-Hua" last="Chung">Ren-Hua Chung</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hauser, Elizabeth R" sort="Hauser, Elizabeth R" uniqKey="Hauser E" first="Elizabeth R." last="Hauser">Elizabeth R. Hauser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Eden R" sort="Martin, Eden R" uniqKey="Martin E" first="Eden R." last="Martin">Eden R. Martin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/gepi.20196</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002D01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title><author><name sortKey="Chung, Ren Ua" sort="Chung, Ren Ua" uniqKey="Chung R" first="Ren-Hua" last="Chung">Ren-Hua Chung</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hauser, Elizabeth R" sort="Hauser, Elizabeth R" uniqKey="Hauser E" first="Elizabeth R." last="Hauser">Elizabeth R. Hauser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Martin, Eden R" sort="Martin, Eden R" uniqKey="Martin E" first="Eden R." last="Martin">Eden R. Martin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Genetic Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="sub">The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Genet. Epidemiol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0741-0395</idno><idno type="eISSN">1098-2272</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-02">2007-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="142">142</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0741-0395</idno></series><idno type="istex">E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/gepi.20196</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GEPI20196</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0741-0395</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>correlation</term><term>family‐based association analysis</term><term>linkage analysis</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Ren‐Hua Chung</name><affiliations><json:string>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</json:string><json:string>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Elizabeth R. Hauser</name><affiliations><json:string>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Eden R. Martin</name><affiliations><json:string>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>linkage analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>family‐based association analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>correlation</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>GEPI20196</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.64</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 790.866 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1492</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5252</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32967</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>220</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>31</volume><publisherId><json:string>GEPI</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>142</last><first>134</first></pages><issn><json:string>0741-0395</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1098-2272</json:string></eissn><title>Genetic Epidemiology</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2272</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/gepi.20196</json:string></doi><id>E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>National Institute of Health - No. NS51355; No. MH59528;</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Ren‐Hua</forename><surname>Chung</surname></persName><affiliation>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</affiliation><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Elizabeth R.</forename><surname>Hauser</surname></persName><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Eden R.</forename><surname>Martin</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: Duke University Medical Center, Box 3468, Durham, NC 27710===</p></note><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Genetic Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="sub">The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Genet. Epidemiol.</title><idno type="pISSN">0741-0395</idno><idno type="eISSN">1098-2272</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2272</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="142">142</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/gepi.20196</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GEPI20196</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>linkage analysis</term></item><item><term>family‐based association analysis</term></item><item><term>correlation</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article category</head><item><term>Original Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2006-04-14">Received</change><change when="2006-10-07">Registration</change><change when="2007-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisherName><publisherLoc>Hoboken</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2272</doi><issn type="print">0741-0395</issn><issn type="electronic">1098-2272</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GEPI"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY">Genetic Epidemiology</title><title type="subtitle">The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society</title><title type="short">Genet. Epidemiol.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="20"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/gepi.v31:2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="31">31</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-02">February 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/gepi.20196</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GEPI20196"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2006-04-14"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2006-09-08"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2006-10-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2006-11-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-11-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-01-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">134</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">142</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Duke University Medical Center, Box 3468, Durham, NC 27710===</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GEPI.GEPI20196.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="31"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Correlation Between Linkage and Association Tests</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1 #af2"><personName><givenNames>Ren‐Hua</givenNames><familyName>Chung</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Elizabeth R.</givenNames><familyName>Hauser</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Eden R.</givenNames><familyName>Martin</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>emartin@chg.duhs.duke.edu</email></contactDetails></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">linkage analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">family‐based association analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">correlation</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>National Institute of Health</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>NS51355</fundingNumber><fundingNumber>MH59528</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. <i>Genet. Epidemiol</i>. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Correlation Between Linkage and Association Tests</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ren‐Hua</namePart><namePart type="family">Chung</namePart><affiliation>Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA</affiliation><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elizabeth R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hauser</namePart><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Eden R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Martin</namePart><affiliation>Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA</affiliation><description>Correspondence: Duke University Medical Center, Box 3468, Durham, NC 27710===</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Hoboken</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-02</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2006-04-14</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2006-10-07</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="references">31</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases efficiency by making maximal use of family data sets. However, it is not intuitively clear under what conditions association and linkage tests performed in the same data set may be correlated. Understanding this relationship is important for interpreting the combined results of both tests. We used computer simulations and theoretical statements to estimate the correlation between linkage statistics (affected sib pair maximum LOD scores) and family‐based association statistics (pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) and association in the pressure of linkage (APL)) under various hypotheses. Different types of pedigrees were studied: nuclear families with affected sib pairs, extended pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees. Both simulation and theoretical results showed that when there is no linkage or no association, the linkage and association tests are not correlated. When there is linkage and association in the data, the two tests have a positive correlation. We concluded that when linkage and association tests are applied in the same data, the type I error rate of neither test will be affected and that power can be increased by applying tests conditionally. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><note type="funding">National Institute of Health - No. NS51355; No. MH59528; </note><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>linkage analysis</topic><topic>family‐based association analysis</topic><topic>correlation</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Genetic Epidemiology</title><subTitle>The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Genet. Epidemiol.</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0741-0395</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1098-2272</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2272</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GEPI</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>31</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>134</start><end>142</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/gepi.20196</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GEPI20196</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= ParkinsonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E5058DEFF082241487BD41FB9966DFF9E1C290EA
|texte= Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family‐based association tests in genome screens
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |